Here’s an interesting article on tagging as a transparency tool. Transparency is a hot topic at the moment. I’m convinced it’s as much a tool for protecting the ownership and so financial interests of news organisations as it is a way of making sure we are getting the whole truth and nothing but; but we all win in the end.
The article also works as a nice round up of collaborative tools available on the web – if you work on line and haven’t heard of some of the tools in the article it’s a good dive in point.
An interesting article from Reuters about China’s increasing attempts at media regulation, reveals a worrying imapact on online resources
…news Web sites collectively agreed to censor themselves to eradicate pornography and violence along with other “unhealthy content”.
The article continues
But the restrictions found favour in the Communist Party mouthpiece People’s Daily, which praised the news Web sites’ decision to self-censor and linked it to Hu’s “eight honours, eight disgraces” campaign that seeks to promote a “socialist sense of honour and shame”.
The move shows the Web site editors “have ability and have confidence in resisting all types of unhealthy Internet information and are positively throwing themselves into building a socialist spiritual civilization,” the commentary said.
Final Salute – an special report from Denvers Rocky Mountain News has won several awards; rightly so.
I showed the multimedia part to my students a while back as they got started on their own multimedia projects. I have rarely heard a class so quiet when it finished.
Im over at one of our regional newspapers next week to start some training for their new multimedia news room and I think I will show them this as a benchmark.
The power of good actuality and pictures combined. Go and take a look and see if you agree.
Journalists, they say, would be wise to do a little keyword research to determine the two or three most-searched words that relate to their subject–and then include them in the first few sentences. “That’s not something they teach in journalism schools,” said Danny Sullivan, editor of SearchEngineWatch, an online newsletter. “But in the future, they should.”
From the New York Times via dotJournalism
Jemima over at dotjournalism has a great comment about the rise of text-to-speech podcasts.
So yes – an inevitable innovation, but not one that does anything at all for the medium of podcasting. This technology must be ergonomic, rather than built around the convenience of the producer. It will only work for people when it has been humanised.
If you havnt visited dotjournalism then you should. How Jemima manages to find time to produce so much stuff I will never know.
After my thoughts yesterday regarding the web setting print agenda; this from CyberJournalist.net
Lots of sites let readers pick their favorite stories, but The Wisconsin State Journal is taking advantage of that online tool to help its print edition.
Readers vote online for their favorite story each day, and the day’s top vote-getter will appear on the front page of the next day’s newspaper, with a “reader’s choice” label. What a great idea.
There never has been a better time to get into Web journalism. We are making money, we are hiring, and we are actively searching for new, innovative ideas. After ten years, there are no veterans in this field. This is your chance to be among the first.
So says Anthony Moor, Associate Managing Editor/Online at the Orlando Sentinel. I know it’s American but you cant argue with the premise – the figures prove it.
The Pulitzer board is meeting to decide its 2006 winners and a rule change means online content is being considered. In an article at Editor and Publisher, Pulitzer Administrator Sig Gissler, had this to say on the subject.
Beyond that, Gissler followed the same secretive approach as the board members. When asked how the new rule change allowing online entries in every journalism category had impacted the judging, he says, “I don’t want to get into characterizing the entries. But we did have online material in the various categories.”
An article on Guardian Unlimited about plans for Mobile Group 3 to sell through clips to broadcast news outfits finished up with this…
The rise of citizen journalism has called into question the future of traditional journalists and editors. Last month, however, the executive editor of Sky News wrote in the media trade journal, Press Gazette: “I happen to think there will still be a role for editors – not just to assess information, but also to prioritise and present it in a way which, as well as making the news understandable, also reinforces its importance and point. [This is] something an anything-goes citizen journalism blog can’t do.
“Professional journalists will always need to decide if it’s news or propaganda.”
It’s a continuing surprise to me that editors continue to talk in such discrete, monolithic tones about ‘blog journalism’. Continue reading “Get off my land says journalist”
A post on Salvi.com gave me pause for thought. The gist of the post was the relative reaction time of the print and online mediums. Online breaks the news and it takes a day for print to catch up.
He uses Charles Taylor as an example.
Today, the newspapers have dutifully mentioned that a probable war criminal is missing: “Liberia’s former leader vanishes days before extradition,” alerts the Guardian. And then I flip to the BBC site, once again. “Charles Taylor caught in Nigeria.”
This made me think less about the speed aspect but more about the agenda setting. How much does the hysteresis of the print process mean that faster mediums will define the news agenda.
Does it appear in the papers because it’s newsworthy or because it appeared online first?
Editorially the Taylor story is a no brainer; of course it’s going to go up. But it made me think that there may still be an issue in the power of a single medium (and evangelical though I am about it not that reliable a medium) to set the agenda.